<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A practical guide to computer security Part 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exploitx.com/100/a-practical-guide-to-computer-security-part-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exploitx.com/100/a-practical-guide-to-computer-security-part-4/</link>
	<description>Technology &#38; Security Tips &#38; Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Donelly</title>
		<link>http://www.exploitx.com/100/a-practical-guide-to-computer-security-part-4/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Donelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 21:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exploitx.com/100/a-practical-guide-to-computer-security-part-4/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>The problem with Dan Keller&#039;s story is that several facts are missing. 

The court in San Francisco found against Keller and he had to pay Abarbanel&#039;s legal expenses as part of the settlement. Keller had denied payment to Abarbanel for over $20,000 of expenses and charges for time worked. He also refused to pay Abarbanel for teaching at HP Labs the same year as the legal case. Keller ran a shoddy operation and cheated more than one contractor during the same contract. Testimony from one other contractor was presented in the court case. This made Keller&#039;s entire claim a sham. 

True. Abarbanel bothered Keller some to get his payment. $20,000 was a big deal then. 

True. Keller was irresponsible. He cheated his contractors. He made promises to his long-time friend, Abarbanel, that he did not keep. His entire operation was a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Dan Keller&#8217;s story is that several facts are missing. </p>
<p>The court in San Francisco found against Keller and he had to pay Abarbanel&#8217;s legal expenses as part of the settlement. Keller had denied payment to Abarbanel for over $20,000 of expenses and charges for time worked. He also refused to pay Abarbanel for teaching at HP Labs the same year as the legal case. Keller ran a shoddy operation and cheated more than one contractor during the same contract. Testimony from one other contractor was presented in the court case. This made Keller&#8217;s entire claim a sham. </p>
<p>True. Abarbanel bothered Keller some to get his payment. $20,000 was a big deal then. </p>
<p>True. Keller was irresponsible. He cheated his contractors. He made promises to his long-time friend, Abarbanel, that he did not keep. His entire operation was a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

