<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blocking Instant Messaging Applications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exploitx.com/140/blocking-instant-messaging-applications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exploitx.com/140/blocking-instant-messaging-applications/</link>
	<description>Technology &#38; Security Tips &#38; Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:56:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.exploitx.com/140/blocking-instant-messaging-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 18:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exploitx.com/140/blocking-instant-messaging-applications/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>DNS is your best software/cheap solution to BLOCK these IM&#039;s, although it does require periodic maintenance.
WebSense or SurfControl is your second best software solution as previously mentioned - although you need a server to run the database on - I think a workstation will work as a server if enough RAM is installed.
--- I wouldn&#039;t think BLOCKing is allowed at an Educational institution because that restricts learning.
I think your best bet is the Packeteer appliance - with this you don&#039;t BLOCK (unlawful at an EDU) but limit the bandwidth of these IM apps to a miserable to use level - thereby slowly negating their use because the response is so slow. Unfortunately Packeteer is not FREE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DNS is your best software/cheap solution to BLOCK these IM&#8217;s, although it does require periodic maintenance.<br />
WebSense or SurfControl is your second best software solution as previously mentioned &#8211; although you need a server to run the database on &#8211; I think a workstation will work as a server if enough RAM is installed.<br />
&#8212; I wouldn&#8217;t think BLOCKing is allowed at an Educational institution because that restricts learning.<br />
I think your best bet is the Packeteer appliance &#8211; with this you don&#8217;t BLOCK (unlawful at an EDU) but limit the bandwidth of these IM apps to a miserable to use level &#8211; thereby slowly negating their use because the response is so slow. Unfortunately Packeteer is not FREE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.exploitx.com/140/blocking-instant-messaging-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 12:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exploitx.com/140/blocking-instant-messaging-applications/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Why don&#039;t you use a path rule rather than a hash rule?

Just block msnmsgr.exe, ypager.exe and any others you find along the way.

Whilst a user could simply rename the file, it seems easier to maintain than a hash list.

Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you use a path rule rather than a hash rule?</p>
<p>Just block msnmsgr.exe, ypager.exe and any others you find along the way.</p>
<p>Whilst a user could simply rename the file, it seems easier to maintain than a hash list.</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jancis</title>
		<link>http://www.exploitx.com/140/blocking-instant-messaging-applications/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Jancis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exploitx.com/140/blocking-instant-messaging-applications/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t read all postings, but i can suggest  one easy step: drop all traffic to messenger central servers - just connect and write down IP&#039;s of servers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t read all postings, but i can suggest  one easy step: drop all traffic to messenger central servers &#8211; just connect and write down IP&#8217;s of servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

