<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Exploits and Security &#187; Exploits and Bugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exploitx.com/category/exploits-and-bugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exploitx.com</link>
	<description>Technology &#38; Security Tips &#38; Guides</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 03:28:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>PHP vulnerabilities</title>
		<link>http://www.exploitx.com/167/php-vulnerabilities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exploitx.com/167/php-vulnerabilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Exploitx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploits and Bugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exploitx.com/167/php-vulnerabilities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ubuntu Security Notice USN-485-1              July 17, 2007
php5 vulnerabilities
CVE-2007-1864, CVE-2007-2728
A security issue affects the following Ubuntu releases:
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS
Ubuntu 6.10
Ubuntu 7.04
This advisory also applies to the corresponding versions of
Kubuntu, Edubuntu, and Xubuntu.
The problem can be corrected by upgrading your system to the
following package [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu Security Notice USN-485-1              July 17, 2007<br />
php5 vulnerabilities<br />
CVE-2007-1864, CVE-2007-2728</p>
<p>A security issue affects the following Ubuntu releases:</p>
<p>Ubuntu 6.06 LTS<br />
Ubuntu 6.10<br />
Ubuntu 7.04</p>
<p>This advisory also applies to the corresponding versions of<br />
Kubuntu, Edubuntu, and Xubuntu.</p>
<p>The problem can be corrected by upgrading your system to the<br />
following package versions:</p>
<p>Ubuntu 6.06 LTS:<br />
 libapache2-mod-php5                      5.1.2-1ubuntu3.9<br />
 php5-xmlrpc                              5.1.2-1ubuntu3.9</p>
<p>Ubuntu 6.10:<br />
 libapache2-mod-php5                      5.1.6-1ubuntu2.6<br />
 php5-xmlrpc                              5.1.6-1ubuntu2.6</p>
<p>Ubuntu 7.04:<br />
 libapache2-mod-php5                      5.2.1-0ubuntu1.4<br />
 php5-xmlrpc                              5.2.1-0ubuntu1.4</p>
<p>In general, a standard system upgrade is sufficient to effect the<br />
necessary changes.<br />
<span id="more-167"></span></p>
<p>Details follow:</p>
<p>It was discovered that the PHP xmlrpc extension did not correctly check<br />
heap memory allocation sizes.  A remote attacker could send a specially<br />
crafted request to a PHP application using xmlrpc and execute arbitrary<br />
code as the Apache user. (CVE-2007-1864)</p>
<p>Stefan Esser discovered a flaw in the random number initialization of the<br />
PHP SOAP extension.  This could lead to remote attackers being able to<br />
predict certain elements of the authentication mechanism. (CVE-2007-2728)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exploitx.com/167/php-vulnerabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dovecot vulnerability</title>
		<link>http://www.exploitx.com/166/dovecot-vulnerability/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exploitx.com/166/dovecot-vulnerability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 00:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Exploitx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploits and Bugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exploitx.com/166/dovecot-vulnerability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ubuntu Security Notice USN-487-1              July 17, 2007
dovecot vulnerability
CVE-2007-2231
A security issue affects the following Ubuntu releases:
Ubuntu 6.06 LTS
Ubuntu 6.10
Ubuntu 7.04
This advisory also applies to the corresponding versions of
Kubuntu, Edubuntu, and Xubuntu.

The problem can be corrected by upgrading your system to the
following package versions:
Ubuntu [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ubuntu Security Notice USN-487-1              July 17, 2007<br />
dovecot vulnerability<br />
CVE-2007-2231</p>
<p>A security issue affects the following Ubuntu releases:</p>
<p>Ubuntu 6.06 LTS<br />
Ubuntu 6.10<br />
Ubuntu 7.04</p>
<p>This advisory also applies to the corresponding versions of<br />
Kubuntu, Edubuntu, and Xubuntu.</p>
<p><span id="more-166"></span></p>
<p>The problem can be corrected by upgrading your system to the<br />
following package versions:</p>
<p>Ubuntu 6.06 LTS:<br />
 dovecot-common                           1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5</p>
<p>Ubuntu 6.10:<br />
 dovecot-common                           1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2</p>
<p>Ubuntu 7.04:<br />
 dovecot-common                           1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1</p>
<p>In general, a standard system upgrade is sufficient to effect the<br />
necessary changes.</p>
<p>Details follow:</p>
<p>It was discovered that Dovecot, when configured to use non-system-user<br />
spools and compressed folders, would allow directory traversals in<br />
mailbox names.  Remote authenticated users could potentially read email<br />
owned by other users.</p>
<p>Updated packages for Ubuntu 6.06 LTS:</p>
<p> Source archives:</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5.diff.gz</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   469298 29bd87efba635fd5eedb3895d20acc46</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5.dsc</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:      867 5036d7a6d364a2ad840b0d54e3339f38</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot_1.0.beta3.orig.tar.gz</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:  1360574 5418f9f7fe99e4f10bb82d9fe504138a</p>
<p> amd64 architecture (Athlon64, Opteron, EM64T Xeon)</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5_amd64.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   962840 6cca1d5abd731afba38bb29f6c9933f5</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5_amd64.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   532874 e9e41c0952c466de86cb5ce0e6587a22</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5_amd64.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   500994 bc7b6969f03f5f311848410e935dfded</p>
<p> i386 architecture (x86 compatible Intel/AMD)</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5_i386.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   838814 753181c3a1179a6ec1bd72b13dc5b9a4</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5_i386.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   486092 d11b682eb421301f797e80194b51b67b</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5_i386.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   456858 d8ca7cb44101b96455b891e9e42bc5b3</p>
<p> powerpc architecture (Apple Macintosh G3/G4/G5)</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5_powerpc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   941292 e1d73b71061280687181e8f938b8e264</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5_powerpc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   526582 4f89130337e474c68a419f4724cf1aa4</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5_powerpc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   494322 ebbdc5b738172d4dfc6b25ec39ddfa91</p>
<p> sparc architecture (Sun SPARC/UltraSPARC)</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5_sparc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   855402 12181c54c433922b9eee15f585a0ae8f</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5_sparc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   492088 9d4880192868043bbc62096ea23ac2e0</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.beta3-3ubuntu5.5_sparc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   462252 5f62fd110c14911bcfb406a84703cb5d</p>
<p>Updated packages for Ubuntu 6.10:</p>
<p> Source archives:</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2.diff.gz</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   473084 483a9eb80e9750acdf385ed824056db9</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2.dsc</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:      900 11dc25bceb20c8e6d6870b53f38bdc3c</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot_1.0.rc2.orig.tar.gz</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:  1257435 e27a248b2ee224e4618aa2f020150041</p>
<p> amd64 architecture (Athlon64, Opteron, EM64T Xeon)</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2_amd64.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   936296 0ae0d9e4217dae4b910b489670f25a5e</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2_amd64.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   387028 dee13d869de26b760f55f2ca79aa9459</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2_amd64.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   353208 7f8cd14c0f45fa2d60b81112361e47ea</p>
<p> i386 architecture (x86 compatible Intel/AMD)</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2_i386.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   833674 a8f0594ac17eaf15b7b8574bed437d8a</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2_i386.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   354212 31a82ddd4094a0293bd80e20387e734a</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2_i386.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   323498 69cb3e9d2aad06b53627a0da1f2f0cf5</p>
<p> powerpc architecture (Apple Macintosh G3/G4/G5)</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2_powerpc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   924998 9158a6ee1b882ec64d2e7bd0ad337ebe</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2_powerpc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   385336 9608f3975460aea5cf553d454f6522ff</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2_powerpc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   352020 9facc03f70e9d7ad823ef0ed4b6fc20c</p>
<p> sparc architecture (Sun SPARC/UltraSPARC)</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2_sparc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   820528 97f8b26eba76a6351c60f2ff2d02a48d</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2_sparc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   347752 b8ce2d4174b4aefee2ddaa311d0db376</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.rc2-1ubuntu2.2_sparc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   316908 d5b9a64f49f61f617e73d6371a3f9ed1</p>
<p>Updated packages for Ubuntu 7.04:</p>
<p> Source archives:</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1.diff.gz</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:    99862 9bf881b3592e2d48e4b31123fe43563b</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1.dsc</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:     1099 c657aea243cfbeac420794c0a43bae95</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot_1.0.rc17.orig.tar.gz</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:  1512386 881bcc7d2c8fba6d337f3e616a602bf7</p>
<p> amd64 architecture (Athlon64, Opteron, EM64T Xeon)</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:  1274644 46145219067be168cfe05961140faabf</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   586540 eac2b3216e1f76c20354c322f3b1bae0</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1_amd64.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   552280 cffa97e43063a8c27382b302541cf00b</p>
<p> i386 architecture (x86 compatible Intel/AMD)</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1_i386.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:  1164578 45655df2ab5d68ab09c17a52b286fef5</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1_i386.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   554174 33f48b9b7d8639ccb75cbccbaa48e59d</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1_i386.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   521498 c7094f9dd1fabcae02f4e535d24c9c7f</p>
<p> powerpc architecture (Apple Macintosh G3/G4/G5)</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1_powerpc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:  1291064 6b55bb639475bcecbf00655ad6cd27ea</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1_powerpc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   590906 6afd3063c2bbe6c46119d7c2bf0114a1</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1_powerpc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   556068 009c76cc27d1812d2abf6d997116e500</p>
<p> sparc architecture (Sun SPARC/UltraSPARC)</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1_sparc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:  1158070 25978232a1680992b84edc754f9f42e9</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1_sparc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   549476 d9d6f94295f77b1d42f6775e38475fd1</p>
<p>http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.rc17-1ubuntu2.1_sparc.deb</p>
<p>     Size/MD5:   517012 58f2daca2b94c95c66f30277f8401373</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exploitx.com/166/dovecot-vulnerability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bugs and Exploits 03-dec</title>
		<link>http://www.exploitx.com/152/bugs-and-exploits-03-dec/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exploitx.com/152/bugs-and-exploits-03-dec/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Exploitx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploits and Bugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exploitx.com/152/bugs-and-exploits-03-dec/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zen-Cart ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zen-Cart <= 1.2.6d blind SQL injection / remote commands execution</p>
<p>http://www.exploitx.com/forum/azbb.php?1133649937</p>
<p>PHP-Fusion v6.00.109 SQL Injection and Info. Disclosure</p>
<p>http://www.exploitx.com/forum/azbb.php?1133650018</p>
<p>DMA[2005-1202a] &#8211; &#8217;sobexsrv &#8211; Scripting/Secure OBEX Server format string vulnerability&#8217;</p>
<p>http://www.exploitx.com/forum/azbb.php?1133650100</p>
<p>[Updated] [FLSA-2005:166943] Updated php packages fix security issues</p>
<p>http://www.exploitx.com/forum/azbb.php?1133650166</p>
<p>eXtreme Styles mod <= 2.2.1 Multiple Vulnerabilities</p>
<p>http://www.exploitx.com/forum/azbb.php?1133650298</p>
<p>MDKSA-2005:223 &#8211; Updated webmin package fixes format string vulnerability</p>
<p>http://www.exploitx.com/forum/azbb.php?1133650370</p>
<p>[OpenPKG-SA-2005.027] OpenPKG Security Advisory (php) </p>
<p>http://www.exploitx.com/forum/azbb.php?1133650418</p>
<p>MDKSA-2005:222 &#8211; Updated mailman packages fix various vulnerabilities</p>
<p>http://www.exploitx.com/forum/azbb.php?1133650461</p>
<p>[OpenPKG-SA-2005.026] OpenPKG Security Advisory (lynx)</p>
<p>http://www.exploitx.com/forum/azbb.php?1133650529</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exploitx.com/152/bugs-and-exploits-03-dec/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A flaw in Google&#8217;s G-Mail system allowed anyone access to any mailbox</title>
		<link>http://www.exploitx.com/151/a-flaw-in-googles-g-mail-system-allowed-anyone-access-to-any-mailbox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exploitx.com/151/a-flaw-in-googles-g-mail-system-allowed-anyone-access-to-any-mailbox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 17:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Exploitx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email Systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exploitx.com/151/a-flaw-in-googles-g-mail-system-allowed-anyone-access-to-any-mailbox/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This bug has already been corrected, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s been published.
In this manual you will see step by step how to exploit Gmail&#8217;s
vulnerability, that gave you access to any account, reported by
Anelkaos, colaborator of elhacker.net&#8217;s forum and patched by Google by
October 18. Due to the bug&#8217;s gravity (that allowed in a few simple steps
to login [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bug has already been corrected, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s been published.</p>
<p>In this manual you will see step by step how to exploit Gmail&#8217;s<br />
vulnerability, that gave you access to any account, reported by<br />
Anelkaos, colaborator of elhacker.net&#8217;s forum and patched by Google by<br />
October 18. Due to the bug&#8217;s gravity (that allowed in a few simple steps<br />
to login in any Gmail account), it was decided not to publish this<br />
document while the bug was still active. Motives are more than obvious<br />
because ALL Gmail accounts were vulnerable to the bug.</p>
<p>Google hasn&#8217;t declared definitively this topic, and they seem to have no<br />
intention of publishing the bug. The veracity of the failure was<br />
demonstrated to the editors of the Magazine &#8220;Seguridad0&#8243;, logging into<br />
an account created for that purpose, just as described in</p>
<p>http://www.elistas.net/lista/informativos/archivo/indice/61/msg/79/.</p>
<p>They also &#8220;dared&#8221; to publish this news in CyruxNET and PCWorld.</p>
<div style="float: left;"><!--adsense--></div>
<p>The bug was discovered in October 14 and it was patched in October 18<br />
because ANELKAOS decided to conctact GMail instead of publishing the bug<br />
in a list of security, and lamentably we couldn&#8217;t do more demos in other<br />
sites that we sent the news, and because we&#8217;re not HBX Networks, all the<br />
people claimed for a &#8220;hacking&#8217; test&#8221;. Thanks to heaven, we have saved<br />
all the mails where Google recognize the failure. <img src='http://www.exploitx.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Unlike the reported by HBX and published by BetaNews last year, this bug<br />
doesn&#8217;t require cookie robbery, and because of that, the bug&#8217;s danger<br />
was considerably higher.</p>
<p>*PROCEDURE*</p>
<p>This is the way Sirdarckcat (EHN&#8217;s user) developed the exploit, although<br />
the original method is easier, the concept is the same one.</p>
<p>Due to the fact that this demonstration was realized against another&#8217;s<br />
person account, all data that could bring legal consequences have been<br />
hiden. In AUTH variable goes the ciphered address of the mail&#8217;s<br />
propetary, and although we don&#8217;t know how to decipher it, we&#8217;ve<br />
preferred to hide its values, in case &#8220;someone else&#8221; could <img src='http://www.exploitx.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>First of all, we need two sessions. For that we&#8217;ve chosen to use<br />
Internet Explorer and Mozilla. We start the session normally&#8230; for<br />
example, in Mozilla..</p>
<p>If we pay attention, we notice that the login screen is now different.<br />
It doesn&#8217;t just ask if you&#8217;ve forgotten your password, it also asks now<br />
for the user. Too much casualty, isn&#8217;t it? That soon and coinciding with<br />
the publishing of the bug&#8217;s existence it has changed the authentication<br />
is too much coincidence, isn&#8217;t it? We&#8217;re talking about 10 days ago <img src='http://www.exploitx.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Well, let&#8217;s continue. Now we need some data we&#8217;ll modify. For that we<br />
will also iniciate an Internet Explorer session, but we stop the browser<br />
as soon as it says &#8220;Loading&#8230;&#8221;.</p>
<p>We simply look at the source code and we save the value of the &#8220;ver&#8221;<br />
variable, that we will need later.</p>
<p>Then we allow the page to continue loading, and we look the direction of<br />
the inbox, that we can see by pressing right clicking, and then Properties.</p>
<p>We will need the &#8220;zx&#8221; variable, and we save it.</p>
<p>Now we go to &#8216;mail/?username=victim&#038;zx=[zx Variable]&#8216;</p>
<p>And we stop the charging of the page just when it stops Loading,<br />
getting inside:</p>
<p>We stop again the browser, and we look at the source code.</p>
<p>Here we have the code of AUTH that we need to initiate session as our<br />
victim, but our cookie disagree (not the same).</p>
<p>We take a look inside the cookie, and we change the value of &#8220;ID&#8221; for<br />
the one we got in the &#8220;ver&#8221; variable we got before, this what surprising<br />
does is to return a valid value! It doesn&#8217;t have related information,<br />
why does that happen? Who knows&#8230;</p>
<p>GMail confirms that it&#8217;s well ciphered, and completes correctly all the<br />
rules. Nevertheless, even the content is not related, it doesn&#8217;t return<br />
an error.</p>
<p>Once modified the cookie, in the Explorer session, we enter into the<br />
following page:</p>
<p>http://mail.google.com/mail?gxlu=victim&#038;zx=[zx Variable]</p>
<p>In this moment we haven&#8217;t already started the session, we&#8217;ve just<br />
associated with the victim&#8217;s account.</p>
<p>So we go to: www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLoginAuth<br />
<http ://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLoginAuth>.</p>
<p>And it sends you to:</p>
<p>mail.google.com/mail/?auth= [CODIGO auth]</p>
<p>At this point all we have to do is to modify the values of the cookie<br />
that will expire&#8230; At least we give it 1 minute of life.</p>
<p>We enter mail.google.com/mail/?&#038;&#038;rm=false&#038;null=Entrar&#038;continue</p>
<p>We stop the loading because if we don&#8217;t, Google is going to close our<br />
session, so we write:</p>
<p>javascript:document.cookie+=&#8221;;expires=Thu,%2001%20Jan%202070%2000:00:00%20GMT&#8221;;</p>
<p>Once extended the cookie&#8217;s life, we enter<br />
http://mail.google.com/mail/?auth=[AUTH Code]</p>
<p>And we start the session as the victim.</p>
<p>Complete access, of course <img src='http://www.exploitx.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>*GOODBYE AND CLOSE.*</p>
<p>OK, it&#8217;s a Beta version, and they don&#8217;t have to report anything. But if<br />
they would have recognized it and published a thank you note, this<br />
information wouldn&#8217;t had been published. We have 3 ways to get to the<br />
same result, the others 2 are quite easier, and because of that easily<br />
we can deduce that it&#8217;s a multibug, and a design error. With all these<br />
clues, they will not take too much to discover new methods.</p>
<p>Source</p>
<p>http://www.indian-hackers.net</p>
<p>Related hyperlinks</p>
<p>http://www.elistas.net/lista/informativos/archivo/indice/61/msg/79/</http></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exploitx.com/151/a-flaw-in-googles-g-mail-system-allowed-anyone-access-to-any-mailbox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Talk cleartext credentials in process memory</title>
		<link>http://www.exploitx.com/150/google-talk-cleartext-credentials-in-process-memory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.exploitx.com/150/google-talk-cleartext-credentials-in-process-memory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Exploitx</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Exploits and Bugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exploitx.com/150/google-talk-cleartext-credentials-in-process-memory/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Title: Google Talk Beta Messenger cleartext credentials in process memory
Affected versions: 1.0.0.64 (this version is believed to be the first one released to the public)
Vendor contacted: 25/08/05
Patched version released: 29/08/05
Advisory released: 28/11/05
Author: pagvac (Adrian Pastor)
Homepage: www.ikwt.com &#8211; In Knowledge We Trust
Advisory URL: www.adrianpv.com/projects/google-talk-cleartext-credentials-in-process-memory.txt
Description
Google Talk stores all user credentials (username and password) in clear-text in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Title: Google Talk Beta Messenger cleartext credentials in process memory</p>
<p>Affected versions: 1.0.0.64 (this version is believed to be the first one released to the public)</p>
<p>Vendor contacted: 25/08/05</p>
<p>Patched version released: 29/08/05</p>
<p>Advisory released: 28/11/05</p>
<p>Author: pagvac (Adrian Pastor)</p>
<p>Homepage: www.ikwt.com &#8211; In Knowledge We Trust</p>
<p>Advisory URL: www.adrianpv.com/projects/google-talk-cleartext-credentials-in-process-memory.txt</p>
<p>Description</p>
<p>Google Talk stores all user credentials (username and password) in clear-text in the process memory. Such vulnerability was found on August 25, 2005 (two days after the release of Google Talk) and has already been patched by Google.</p>
<p>This issue would occur regardless of whether the &#8220;Save Password&#8221; feature was enabled or not.</p>
<p>It was noticed that the Google Talk client was loading all the credentials unencrypted in the memory of the process &#8220;googletalk.exe&#8221;. It was possible to recover the password by dumping the process memory to a file with PMDump and which could then examined with a hex editor.</p>
<p>The vulnerability would allow anyone with access to the client system to obtain the username and password of the current user. This vulnerability could also be exploited by fooling the user to execute malicious code which would dump the memory of the process &#8220;googletalk.exe&#8221; and then parse the credentials and finally send them to the attacker.</p>
<div style="float: left;"><!--adsense--></div>
<p>It is also worth mentioning that sometimes, no direct user interaction is required for the execution of malicious code. Crackers often exploit vulnerabilities in web browsers and email clients that allow them to execute malicious code on the victim&#8217;s machine without requiring the victim to manually execute the trojaned executable. This means that given the right scenario, this vulnerability could have been exploited in such a way.</p>
<p>References</p>
<p>PMDump &#8211; http://ntsecurity.nu/toolbox/pmdump/<br />
Free Hex Editor &#8211; http://www.chmaas.handshake.de/delphi/freeware/xvi32/xvi32.htm<br />
Google Talk &#8211; http://www.google.com/talk/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.exploitx.com/150/google-talk-cleartext-credentials-in-process-memory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
